As I sit here, sleepless in Waterloo, having enjoyed a stimulating day ( that just happened to coincide with World Water Day) with my gracious Canadian hosts, I thought I'd reflect on yesterday. My ramblings may disturb, annoy, or upset you, so that's why the title of the post begins with an admonition: Reader Beware!
Is World Water Day worthwhile? OMG, what a terrible thing to say! Of course it's worthwhile - it raises our awareness about the plight of those less fortunate than we are in the developed world. How could I say such a thing?
So what set me off? Surely not the wonderful dinner I had at Dave and Marie Rudolph's home last night. Nor the nifty Canadian Olympic T-shirt Dave gave me. I must confess - it was Emily Green, who posted this item on her blog yesterday. It's provocative, and that's what I like.
Today is “World Water Day.” Yippee. Yikes. Whatever. It would be hypocritical of me not to confess to using the occasional chronological gimmick to further pet causes (highlighting March as “Red Cross month” on this site after the Chilean earthquake is a recent example.) But, as a rule, this kind of thing confuses me. Who in their right mind thought, “Hey, we’re wrecking the world. I’ve got an idea! Let’s name a special day (week, year).”
Climate Week didn’t stop the Chinese from upending Copenhagen talks. Forty years of “Earth Day” did nothing to stop the generation that first celebrated it from popularizing the SUV. World Water Day has a hilariously well hydrated-looking Nestle executive in the news.
As we parse the mess we make, dare we conclude that special days are so last century, that while the event-ification of creeping disaster keeps a lot of excitable PRs busy, chronological gimmicks don’t do a damn bit of good for our blue marble? A modest proposal: How about we grow up, fire the event organizers and get down to 365 programs that actually work?
I read her post several times, as well as the comments to her post. I think there is enough of the curmudgeon in me to accept her premise.
And if that's not enough, read this Op-Ed in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution by David S. Abraham, director of the ClearWater Initiative, and Michael Breen. They correctly state that providing clean water does more than improve people's lives, but can promote peace and address our national security needs. The latter may seem like a very selfish motive but if that's what it takes to sell WaSH aid to individual donors and donor agencies, I'll do it (and I have). Just don't attach any strings, please.
Finally, let me tell you one thing I worry about when I see people soliciting funds for clean water water projects. Are those funds being well spent on sustainable projects? If we build water systems and drill wells, do the communities affected have the means to maintain the infrastructure? Is the technology employed appropriate? In my view, unsustainable projects are worse than no projects at all. They provide false hope and are little more than 'feel good' projects for donors and providers. It's the height of selfishness.
There, I feel better.
Thanks, Emily.
In the interests of balance, here is a more sanguine view of World Water Day.
"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need. " --Khalil Gibran
Recent Comments