Charles V. Stern and Pervaze A. Sheikh have updated (17 May 2019) this very important CRS report, Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role.
Download CRS_CO_River_Mgmt_Allocations_17May2019
Here is the introductory information.
Introduction
The Colorado River Basin covers more than 246,000 square miles in seven U.S. states (Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California) and Mexico. Pursuant to federal law, the Bureau of Reclamation (part of the Department of the Interior) manages much of the basin’s water supplies. Colorado River water is used primarily for agricultural irrigation and municipal and industrial (M&I) uses, but it also is important for power production, fish and wildlife, and recreational uses.
In recent years, consumptive uses of Colorado River water have exceeded natural flows. This causes an imbalance in the basin’s available supplies and competing demands. A drought in the basin dating to 2000 has raised the prospect of water delivery curtailments and decreased hydropower production, among other things. In the future, observers expect that increasing demand for supplies, coupled with the effects of climate change, will further increase the strain on the basin’s limited water supplies.
River Management
The Law of the River is the commonly used shorthand for the multiple laws, court decisions, and other documents governing Colorado River operations. The foundational document of the Law of the River is the Colorado River Compact of 1922. Pursuant to the compact, the basin states established a framework to apportion the water supplies between the Upper and Lower Basins of the Colorado River, with the dividing line between the two basins at Lee Ferry, AZ (near the Utah border). The Upper and Lower Basins each were allocated 7.5 million acre- feet (MAF) annually under the Colorado River Compact; an additional 1.5 MAF in annual flows was made available to Mexico under a 1944 treaty. Future agreements and court decisions addressed numerous other issues (including intrastate allocations of flows), and subsequent federal legislation provided authority and funding for federal facilities that allowed users to develop their allocations. A Supreme Court ruling also confirmed that Congress designated the Secretary of the Interior as the water master for the Lower Basin, a role in which the federal government manages the delivery of all water below Hoover Dam.
Reclamation and basin stakeholders closely track the status of two large reservoirs—Lake Powell in the Upper Basin and Lake Mead in the Lower Basin—as an indicator of basin storage conditions. Under recent guidelines, dam releases from these facilities are tied to specific water storage levels. For Lake Mead, the first tier of “shortage,” under which Arizona’s and Nevada’s allocations would be decreased, would be triggered if Lake Mead’s January 1 elevation is expected to fall below 1,075 feet above mean sea level. As of early 2019, Reclamation projected that there was a 69% chance of a shortage condition at Lake Mead in 2020; there was also a lesser chance of Lake Powell reaching critically low levels. Improved hydrology in early 2019 may decrease the chances of shortage in the immediate future.
Drought Contingency
Despite previous efforts to alleviate future shortages, the basin’s hydrological outlook has generally worsened in recent years. After several years of negotiations, in early 2019 Reclamation and the basin states transmitted to Congress additional plans to alleviate stress on basin water supplies. These plans, known as the drought contingency plans (DCPs) for the Upper and Lower Basins, were authorized by Congress in April 2019 in the Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan Authorization Act (P.L. 116-14). The DCPs among other things obligate Lower Basin states to additional water supply cutbacks at specified storage levels (i.e., cutbacks beyond previous curtailment plans), commit Reclamation to additional water conservation efforts, and coordinate Upper Basin operations to protect Lake Powell storage levels and hydropower generation.
Congressional Role
Congress plays a multifaceted role in federal management of the Colorado River basin. Congress funds and oversees management of basin facilities, including operations and programs to protect and restore endangered species. It has also enacted and continues to consider Indian water rights settlements involving Colorado River waters and development of new water storage facilities in the basin. In addition, Congress has approved funding to mitigate water shortages and conserve basin water supplies and has enacted new authorities to combat drought and its effects on basin water users (i.e., the DCPs and other related efforts).
Enjoy!
“The mind needs books like the sword needs a whetstone.” - Tyrion Lannister (@GameOfThrones, season 1, episode 2)
THANK YOU … for your input … the “WE” to i reference is all those effected by the decisions make by others … reputedly in our stead … but here in ARIZONA those decisions and discussions only occur behind closed doors and without any public input … BUT … WE are expected to immediately comply with all the new rules, regulations promulgated … and then WE discover these new rules only apply to us as those formulating the rules, insert get out of jail free cards for themselves…
The myriad of issues within the Compact of the River can only be authentically resolved when WE have an authentic seat at the table…
Respectffuly,
Posted by: paul millef | Saturday, 25 May 2019 at 12:46 PM
Paul - when you refer to ‘we’ are you speaking of the people? I’m not going to defend the Federal Government or the stake holders within the Colorado River Basin. I do want to point out that Reclamation does solicit public feedback on decisions that affect all of us concerning the river. They solicit all opinions, ideas and suggestions.
The only caveat I can say is that you have to look at both Upper Basin and Lower Basin Reclamation web sites to make your thoughts known.
Like anything worthwhile, you have to drill down for answers to your questions.
Posted by: Dave Gunderson | Friday, 24 May 2019 at 07:50 PM
There is no a week that goes by without some new comment about the Colorado River …here’s my problem … I do not read where WE - the people - been given an authentic seat in this discussion, nor are there any provisions noting that WE have oversight …the players in this discussion remain … big cities, federal government, corporate farming, industry, power providers … yet without our authentic buy-in all the discussions and $$$$ spent ends in disaster...
Posted by: paul millef | Thursday, 23 May 2019 at 10:05 AM