This is the kind of CRS report (12 March 2021) that will likely be updated a few times over the next 18 months or so. It's got the Natural Resources A-team here: Charles V. Stern, Nicole T. Carter, Pervaze A. Sheikh, Anna E. Normand, Eva Lipiec, and Peter Folger: Water Resource Issues in the 117th Congress.
Download CRS_Report_WR_Issues_117Congress_12March2021
Whenever I post these CRS reports, which are truly 'hidden' treasures, I rarely comment on them and let the reader draw their own conclusions. I will make some comments on this one.
Lots of important issues are in the report: Great Lakes (increasing water levels, water quality, cooperation with Canada); Western drought; Columbia River Treaty (cooperation with Canada); Indian Water Rights SettlementsSettlements; Cooperation with Mexico - Rio Grande and Colorado River; Water Resource Science at the USGS; Protecting and Restoring the Environment (Everglades, Gulf Coast, etc.); nature-based solutions; and more.
I was especially pleased to see that groundwater and recharge were there. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act was specifically mentioned and acknowledged that it was a State of California effort, not one of Reclamation's.
Water quality was not listed separately as an issue. It was mentioned as part of the Great Lakes. But there was nothing about the 'forever chemicals' (PFAS), drinking water (SDWA was mentioned in some of the copious footnotes. But it should be given more visibility - a separate heading would be very good.
The graphic is not from the report (click here). Click on it to enlarge it. Here we go...
Summary
Congress engages in authorization and appropriations for water resource projects and activities of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), as well as involvement in water resource activities by other agencies. USACE constructs projects nationwide, primarily to improve navigation, reduce flood damage, and res tore aquatic ecosystems. Reclamation constructs projects as authorized in the 17 arid and semiarid states west of the Mississippi River; these projects primarily provide water supply benefits, often to agricultural irrigation users. The 117th Congress may conduct oversight and may deliberate on authorization and funding of water resource development, management, and protection. The 117th Congress, like earlier Congresses, also may consider authorization of new or amended Indian water rights settlements and may evaluate the focus of and funding for the water resource science activities of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).Development pressures, droughts and floods, and concerns about land-use change and climate change, among other issues, have given rise to interest in federal financial and technical assistance for water resource science and projects. Stakeholders are interested in a range of water resource issues, including
new water resource infrastructure (e.g., storm surge gates, water storage) and new kinds of water resource projects (e.g., groundwater recharge, nature-based flood risk reduction);
reinvestment in aging water resource infrastructure and use of hydrologic science and real-time monitoring and forecasting to improve infrastructure operations;
funding and financing of projects, including whether and how to shift from federally led projects to federal partnerships with state and/or local entities; and
activities to protect and restore aquatic ecosystems and enhance flood resilience (including the use of nature-based approaches).
Some topics largely relate to specific agencies. USACE-related topics that may be considered include efforts to update the agency’s authorities to incorporate new mission areas and address the agency’s aging infrastructure. Congress also may address Reclamation drought mitigation activities in the Colorado River Basin and other areas. In addition, Congress may explore ongoing issues associated with Reclamation’s project operations in Ca lifornia and other areas; Congress may address how these issues affect water deliveries to irrigation districts and municipalities and how they impact threatened and endangered species, among others.
In addition to domestic water resource issues, some topics are international in character. Regarding freshwater bodies shared with Canada, potential topics for the 117th Congress include federal funding for activities supporting Great Lakes restoration and negotiations (and any resulting agreements) with Canada to modify the Columbia River Treaty. Potential topics related to Mexico include oversight of a binational agreement on water sharing during dry conditions in the Colorado River Basin and Mexico’s deliveries to the United States in the Rio Grande Basin.
Crosscutting topics (i.e., topics relevant to multiple agencies and programs) also are part of congressional water resource deliberations. For example, Congress may consider the status and priority of new and ongoing federal efforts to restore large - scale aquatic ecosystems that have been altered or impaired by changes to their natural conditions (e.g., Florida Everglades and the Chesapeake Bay). Congress may be interested in the funding and performance of existing restoration efforts, including what changes, if any, may be necessary to improve project delivery and evaluation. In addition, Congress may consider its guidance to multiple federal agencies on how to respond to flood hazards, including efforts related to enhancing the resilience of infrastructure and communities to flooding. Many have expressed interest in developing and evaluating approaches that protect natural elements that reduce flood risk (e.g., natural dunes) or are “nature-based” in comprehensive flood risk management (e.g., constructed dunes). Congress also may consider legislation and oversight on USACE supplemental appropriations for response to and recovery from floods.
Introduction
Demands on available water supplies have heightened local and regional water-use conflicts throughout the United States, particularly in the West and the Southeast. Development pressures, droughts, floods, and concerns about land-use change and climate change, among other issues, have increased stakeholder interest in federal financial and technical assistance for water resource projects. Many have expressed interest in constructing new water resource infrastructure (e.g., storm surge gates, water storage) at various locations, as well as in new types of projects (e.g., groundwater recharge, nature-based flood risk reduction). In addition, some stakeholders and Members of Congress have expressed interest in reinvestment in aging water resource infrastructure and in improved management of available water supplies through water science, monitoring, and operational changes. Water resource policy questions that the 117th Congress may consider include the following:
-
What should be the federal role in maintaining the performance and safety of existing water resource infrastructure?
-
Under what conditions and how should the federal government be involved in planning and constructing water resource projects?
How should water resource science, observation, and monitoring inform water resource management, project design, and operation?
Congress plays a role in water resources through authorization of, and appropriations for, projects and activities. Some of these projects are for facilitating navigation and expanding water supplies for irrigation and other uses. Other projects aim to achieve goals such as reducing flood and/or drought losses or restoring aquatic ecosystems.
Congress principally directs either the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in the Department of Defense or the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) in the Department of the Interior (DOI) to plan, construct, operate, and maintain the majority of federally owned water resource projects. Reclamation projects generally are located in the 17 arid and semiarid states west of the Mississippi River; these projects are designed principally to provide reliable supplies of water for irrigation and some municipal and industrial uses. USACE constructs projects nationwide primarily to improve navigation, reduce flood damage, and restore aquatic ecosystems. In recent years, USACE generally has constructed more new projects than Reclamation, although both agencies have continued to construct new facilities. Congress also authorizes and funds selected water resource science and monitoring activities at multiple federal agencies. DOI’s U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has a prominent role in federal water resource science and observation (e.g., streamgages, groundwater information). The water-related programs and activities of federal agencies other than USACE, Reclamation, and USGS are largely outside the scope of this report, which focuses on water resources issues. This report also does not address federal support for municipal water systems; municipal wastewater infrastructure; or environmental protections, such as water quality and wetlands regulations.
This report covers broad categories of water resource topics that the 117th Congress may consider—projects and activities of USACE and Reclamation, as well as related issues such as Indian water rights settlements, international waters shared with Canada and Mexico, and water resource science at USGS. It also provides information on crosscutting topics, including support for aging and new water resource projects, protection and restoration of the environment, efforts to facilitate flood resilience and natural and nature-based infrastructure, and groundwater recharge.
Cutting to the chase...
Conclusion
Many factors shape water resource issues that the 117th Congress may consider. These factors include demand for reliable water supplies; hydrologic conditions, such as droughts, floods, and effects of climate change; issues regarding safety and performance of existing infrastructure; and interests and concerns about alternative financing and public-private partnerships.The 117th Congress may consider some measures proposed but not enacted in the 116th Congress, as well as new legislative proposals. In the water resource area, legislative activity often has been specific to the federal water resource management agencies or to water use by particular sectors, including energy, agriculture, navigation, recreation, and municipal and industrial use. Occasionally, Congress takes up broader water resource policy issues, such as coordination of federal water resource activities, programs, science, and research.
Congress and other decisionmakers often make water resource decisions within a complicated context. These decisions may involve existing federal infrastructure and its beneficiaries, multiple or conflicting objectives, various legal decisions, multiple environmental and natural resource statutes, and long-established institutional mechanisms (e.g., water rights and contractual obligations). These decisions also occur within a federalist framework in which water resource responsibilities are shared with state, local, and tribal governments and the private sector.
Enjoy!
"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them." - Joseph Brodsky (quoted in @ParadeMagazine via @TheWeek)
Comments