WaterWired

Patrick Griffiths: Good Water News for the City of Bend - OWRD Conservation Award and More!

One of the first WaterWonks I met when I arrived in Oregon in 2006 was Patrick Griffiths of the City of Bend. Patrick hosted me on a visit to the water facilities and was a veritable fountain (pardon the pun) of information not only on Bend's legendary water system but also on Oregon water issues, people and idiosyncrasies. No question was too simple or vague.

Patrick and I have not communicated for a few years so it was wonderful to hear from him. He's now Water Resources Manager for the City of Bend so he was naturally proud of a recent award Bend received from the Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD).

Here is the email he sent: 

So wanted to share some good news – you can decide if it is noteworthy and worthy of sharing on WaterWired or other channels.

Bend has again won Gold – tying for first with City of Ashland in OWRD's recent Conservation Awards  (news release attached):

Download 18-08AnnoucementofWinners

Much of the credit goes to budget bounce back post-recession and hiring a great Conservation Program manager and staff, but for me after 18 years of chipping away on the conservation continuum as part of my water resources responsibilities and supply portfolio, we submitted our “Top Ten Integrated Conservation Strategies” to try and show the whole iceberg of work going on to support our public facing WaterWise Program.

They (OWRD) liked it and I think responded to the comprehensive nature of what we have going on.  The 2000-2017 water production graph is a compelling look at water use too!  Clearly always more to do, but big data is getting into the water world with mostly good results!

I have also attached part of our nomination submittal for your review!  Please share out as you see fit.

Download 2018SummaryTopTen ConservationBend

In addition, we are concluding a significant Reclamation Basin Study with some interesting results for the Deschutes, and the irrigation districts are doing some of their best “system improvement plans” (SIPS) to date and chasing big federal money to modernize.  A particular frog and some federal statutes are helping prioritize them a bit…  so lots going on at the basin level too.  Add in the Oregon Legislature apparently making water a priority again as well… could be timely to talk water education!  The state and the Tribes are putting on a invite only water summit Oct 21/22 and facilitated by Jamie Damon. Perhaps you guys can score an invite? (I will raise OSU staff invites at a planning meeting later this week too).

On that note, regardless of the water summit dates, since we now have a little OSU Cascades Campus over here (and growing), I would love to invite you and perhaps your hydrogeologist partner in programmatic crime (Todd) over to sip something from one of our breweries, distilleries or wineries soon to do some informal brainstorming on some water coursework of the future! Be great to chat regardless!  If you have others over here we should pull in, let's do it!

We could throw in a  tour of our new state-of-the-art Water Filtration Facility too and inspect the raw materials of above mentioned product tasting!

Let me know your thoughts and always happy to answer questions and explain our work to date!

Cheers

pg

So good to hear from Patrick and the work he and his staff have done in Bend. I just may take him up on a visit to the other side of the mountains.

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." - Aristotle

Lindsey Aldaco-Manner et al. Paper: 'Analysis of Four Governance Factors on Efforts of Water Governing Agencies to Increase Water Reuse in the San Antonio Region'

Lindsey Aldaco-Manner is someone I know well. I tried to get her to come to Oregon State University but she went to Texas A&M instead, where she thrived. After receiving her Master's degree and doing a bunch of other stuff at TAMU she went on to become the President of the World Youth Parliament for Water. I saw her at the 8WWF in Brasilia last March and again in June at the GWP Steering Committee meeting in Stockholm. I took the picture of her as she answered a question while addressing the GWP SC on the activities of the WYPW.

She has just published a paper based on her thesis; co-authors are her adviser Rabi Mohtar and TAMU Professor Kent Portney (click on the title to read the paper online or download the PDF below):

Analysis of Four Governance Factors on Efforts of Water Governing Agencies to Increase Water Reuse in the San Antonio Region

Download LAM_Paper_Governance

Abstract

Securing sources for water reuse and coordinating efforts of water governing agencies to do so are critical to realizing the potential of reused water to provide nearly 24% of the water demand of the San Antonio Region, defined as regions “L” and “K” by the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). This research identifies key governance factors that contribute to increasing water reuse within the water planning sector and tests four governance-related hypotheses for their impact on efforts to increase water reuse in the Region. Variables tested include: the type and scale of water governance agency, the agency's frequency of communication with the TWDB, and the agency's familiarity with the TWDB water strategy supplies as defined in the Texas State Water Plan of 2017. A questionnaire addressing these variables was sent to water governing agencies in regions L and K; the response rate was 39.5%. Each variable was cross-tabulated with agency efforts to increase water reuse. Seven regression analysis models were calculated among the factors to test for statistical significance and impact on increasing water reuse efforts. Results indicate that nearly 70% of agencies in the regions have efforts to increase water reuse by as much as 10%. Among the tested hypotheses, frequency in communication with the TWDB was statistically significant for increasing agency efforts to reuse water. Results from these hypotheses are expected to help water managers identify key, governance-related factors that contribute to increased water reuse.

Highlights 

•Water reuse has the potential to supply 24% of needed water in the San Antonio Region.

•Low reported efforts to increase water reuse by water governing agencies.

•Fifty-eight percent of agencies do not communicate with state water planners at all.

•Greater frequency in communication with state planners increases water reuse.

Enjoy!

"Every day on Earth's another chance to get it right." - @SteveEarle in @wasingtonpost via @TheWeek

CRS Report: 'Land and Water Conservation Fund: Overview, Funding History, and Issues'

I did not know there was such an entity - Land and Water Conservation Fund - until I saw this CRS report, Land and Water Conservation Fund: Overview, Funding History, and Issues by Carol Hardy Vincent that was issued on 17 August 2018.

From the LWCF site

The Land and Water Conservation Fund was established by Congress in 1964 to fulfill a bipartisan commitment to safeguard our natural areas, water resources and cultural heritage, and to provide recreation opportunities to all Americans. Using zero taxpayer dollars, the fund invests earnings from offshore oil and gas leasing to help strengthen communities, preserve our history and protect our national endowment of lands and waters. The LWCF program can be divided into the "State Side" which provides grants to State and local governments, and the "Federal Side" which is used to acquire lands, waters, and interests therein necessary to achieve the natural, cultural, wildlife, and recreation management objectives of federal land management agencies.

The CRS report (click on the graphics to enlarge them):

Download CRS_LWCFund_ Overview_17August2018

Summary
The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) Act of 1965 was enacted to help preserve, develop, and ensure access to outdoor recreation facilities to strengthen the health of U.S. citizens. The law created the Land and Water Conservation Fund in the U.S. Treasury as a funding source to implement its outdoor recreation goals.

The LWCF has been used for three general purposes. First, it has been the principal source of monies for land acquisition for outdoor recreation by four federal agencies—the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and Forest Service. Second, the LWCF also funds a matching grant program to assist states in recreational planning, acquiring recreational lands and waters, and developing outdoor recreational facilities. There are two aspects to this “stateside” program: the traditional state grants and the more recent competitive state grants. Under the traditional state grant program, a portion of the appropriation is divided equally among the states, with the remainder apportioned based on need. Each state awards its grant money based on its own outdoor recreation plan and priorities. The competitive state grant program, begun in FY2014, funds recreation projects in urbanized areas meeting certain criteria. Third, beginning in FY1998, LWCF has been used to fund other federal programs with related purposes, such as the Forest Legacy program of the Forest Service and grants under the Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund of the Fish and Wildlife Service.

Under the LWCF Act, the fund is authorized through September 30, 2018, to accrue $900 million annually from multiple sources. However, nearly all of the revenue is derived from oil and gas leasing in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). The LWCF receives additional money under more recent legislation (P.L. 109-432, “GOMESA”). Throughout the history of the LWCF, $40.0 billion in revenues have accrued under both the LWCF Act and GOMESA.

Congress determines the level of funding for the three LWCF purposes through the annual appropriations process. These discretionary appropriations have fluctuated widely since the origin of the program. In addition, any funds deposited under GOMESA are mandatory appropriations for the state grant program. Mandatory appropriations were relatively small from FY2009- FY2017. They increased substantially in FY2018, and are expected to remain relatively high at least over the next decade, due to additional revenues from leasing in the Gulf of Mexico.

Less than half of the $40.0 billion in total revenues that have accrued in the LWCF have been appropriated ($18.4 billion). FY2001 marked the highest funding ever, with appropriations exceeding the authorized level by reaching nearly $1 billion. For FY2018, the most recent fiscal year, the total appropriation was $487.6 million (with $425.0 million in discretionary funds and $62.6 million in mandatory funds).

The $18.4 billion appropriated through the history of the program has been allocated unevenly among federal land acquisition (61%), the state grant program (25%), and other purposes (14%). Similarly, federal land acquisition funds have been allocated unevenly among the four agencies.

A variety of issues pertaining to the LWCF are the subject of legislation, hearings, and other debate. Some of them are being considered as part of deliberations over whether to reauthorize the LWCF beyond September 30, 2018. Issues include the optimal level of funding for LWCF overall and its individual components, whether to reauthorize provisions of the LWCF, and whether to retain discretionary appropriations or provide additional mandatory appropriations. Other issues involve whether LWCF funds should be used for additional purposes, such as maintenance, or set aside for particular priorities, such as securing additional access to federal lands for recreation. The priority of the state grant program vis-à-vis federal acquisition is being debated, as is the extent to which the fund should be used for other programs benefitting states.

Who knew?

Enjoy!

“No just cause is futile, even if it’s lost, if it helps make the future better than the past.” - @SenJohnMcCain.

Water Alternatives, 11(2) - June 2018 Themed Section: Water and Waste - Reduce and Reuse

WWW 2017 Themed Section: Water and Waste: Reduce and Reuse
If you cannot access the articles below, click here.

Wastewater governance and the local, regional and global environments
Marianne Kjellén
Water Alternatives 11(2): 219-237               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Viewpoint – Pouring money down the drain: Can we break the habit by reconceiving wastes as resources?
Michael Bruce Beck, Michael Thompson, Dipak Gyawali, Simon Langan and JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer
Water Alternatives 11(2): 260-283               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Global assessment of accountability in water and sanitation services using GLAAS data
Alejandro Jiménez, John Livsey, Imenne Åhlén, Cecilia Scharp and Marina Takane
Water Alternatives 11(2): 238-259               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Gender differences related to WASH in schools and educational efficiency
Dorice Agol and Peter Harvey
Water Alternatives 11(2): 284-296               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Articles

The evolution and importance of 'rules-in-use' and low-level penalties in village-level collective action
Brian Joubert and Robert Summers
Water Alternatives 11(2): 297-313               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

The power of pipes: Mapping urban water inequities through the material properties of networked water infrastructures - The case of Lilongwe, Malawi
Sachin Tiwale, Maria Rusca and Margreet Zwarteveen
Water Alternatives 11(2): 314-335               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Abstracting water to extract minerals in Mongolia’s South Gobi Province
Sara L. Jackson
Water Alternatives 11(2): 336-356               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Community management or coproduction? The role of state and citizens in rural water service delivery in India
Paul Hutchings
Water Alternatives 11(2): 357-374               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Grounding the nexus: Examining the integration of small-scale irrigators into a national food security programme in Burkina Faso
Brian Dowd-Uribe, Moussa Sanon, Carla Roncoli and Ben Orlove
Water Alternatives 11(2): 375-393               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Disaster capitalism? Examining the politicisation of land subsidence crisis in pushing Jakarta’s seawall megaproject
Thanti Octavianti and Katrina Charles
Water Alternatives 11(2): 394-420               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Pursuing the state’s hydraulic mission in a context of private groundwater use in the Izmir province, Turkey
Selin Le Visage, Marcel Kuper, Jean-Philippe Venot, Murat Yercan and Ela Atış
Water Alternatives 11(2): 421-438               Abstract | Full Text - PDF

Book Reviews

Sustaining Lake Superior: An extraordinary lake in a changing world (Langston, N., 2017).
Helen Ingram
Water Alternatives 11(2): 439-440               Full Text - PDF

Stemming the tide: Human rights and water policy in a neoliberal world (Baer, M., 2017).
Andrea Beck
Water Alternatives 11(2): 441-444               Full Text - PDF

 "A little bit of irreverence is good; a lot is better." - Ann Campana Judge, 1951- 2001

Paper: 'Sociohydrological Impacts of Water Conservation Under Anthropogenic Drought in Austin, TX (USA)'

Interesting paper by Betsy Breyer, Samuel C. Zipper and Jiangxiao Qiu:   Sociohydrological Impacts of Water Conservation Under Anthropogenic Drought in Austin, TX (USA), Water Resources Research, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021155 

Download Breyer_et_al-2017-Water_Reso_Res

Download Supporting_Information_Breyer

Abstract
Municipal water providers increasingly respond to drought by implementing outdoor water use restrictions to reduce urban water withdrawals and maintain water availability. However, restricting urban outdoor water use to support watershed‐scale drought resilience may generate unanticipated cross‐scale interactions, for example, by altering drought response and recovery in urban vegetation or urban streamflow. Despite this, urban water conservation is rarely conceptualized or modeled as endogenous to the water cycle. Here we investigate cross‐scale interactions among urban water conservation and water availability, water use, and sociohydrological response in Austin, TX (USA) during a recent anthropogenic (human‐influenced) drought. Multiscalar statistical analyses demonstrated that outdoor water conservation for reservoir management at the municipal scale produced responses that can cascade both “upward” from the city to the watershed (e.g., decoupling streamflow patterns upstream and downstream of Austin at the watershed scale) and “downward” to exert heterogeneous effects within the city (e.g., redistributing water along a socioeconomic gradient at submunicipal scales, with effects on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems). We suggest that adapting to anthropogenic drought through irrigation curtailment requires sustained engagement between hydrology and social sciences to integrate socioeconomic status and political feedbacks within and among irrigator groups into the water cycle. Findings from this cross‐disciplinary study highlight the importance of a multiscalar and spatially explicit perspectives in urban sociohydrology research to uncover how water conservation as adaptation to anthropogenic drought links hydrological processes with issues of socioeconomic inequality and spatiotemporal scale in the Anthropocene.

Key points:

• Municipal outdoor water conservation generates cross‐scale interactions between the watershed and submunicipal processes

• Effects of outdoor water conservation on urban vegetation follow a socioeconomic gradient, with affluence a major driver for water stress

• Sociohydrology must account for heterogeneity within the urban water cycle and open the “black box” of the city

 

'Sociohydrological' - I like that.

Enjoy! 

"Money won't make you happy. I now have $50 million but I was just as happy when I had $48 million." - Arnold Schwarzenegger