WaterWired

Lane Community College's Online Water Conservation Technician Program - Fall 2019 Apps Accepted

Brenda Cervantes of Lane Community College in Eugene, OR, sent me this information on LCC's new online Water Conservation Technician program. It's funded by the National Science Foundation.

Here is the blurb from the website:

The Water Conservation Technician program consists of an inspiring community of students and faculty dedicated to improving community water security and quality using ecologically sustainable practices. Through the two-year Water Conservation Technician online program, you will be prepared for the growing field of Water Conservation and the challenges a shortage of water will bring. 

The Program trains individuals to evaluate water use patterns; develop, implement, market and maintain conservation programs; perform public outreach; recommend water efficiency techniques; integrate alternative water sources, and perform systems analysis to solve problems.

As water-related issues continue to increase, more voluntary and mandatory water conservation opportunities are being created that require a technical skill set like that which is offered within this program. Employment opportunities in Water Conservation are excellent. Students must consider the Western United States when seeking employment as those willing to relocate will have greater employment opportunities. 

What's the starting pay?

• Oregon state wages range from $32,000 to $48,500  annually plus benefits. Wages will vary in other states.

Prepare for a career in the water field as water efficiency technicians, coordinators, or specialists, or as water management specialists and technicians. The program prepares students to design, implement and evaluate water conservation programs.

For more information on the two-year degree programs and training for water professionals contact Roger Ebbage, ebbager@lanecc.edu or (541) 463-6160. 

The fall term starts on 30 September 2019. Admissions close one week before that date. The program does have requirements that must be satisfied before admission so check with Roger. 

Here is a video:

Information from an alternate site - the Northwest Water and Energy Institute at LCC:

Graduates Of The Program Are Able To

• Design, implement, evaluate, and market water conservation programs to a broad audience
• Evaluate water usage patterns for rural, urban, residential, and commercial sites; recommend efficiency measures as well as alternate water sources.
• Understand water distribution, flow, and elimination systems; basic hydraulics; quality issues; balance and time of use.
• Understand the many stressors to water accessibility and how they interact to affect supply and demand along with other issues.
• Monitor, collect, interpret and analyze data to evaluate effectiveness of programs and modify them over time.
• Calculate water and cost savings and produce comprehensive cost/benefit analysis reports.

Some relevant job titles are:

• Water Conservation - Program Specialist, Manager

• Water Resource - Analyst, Specialist

• Rainwater Harvesting Tech

• Stormwater - Coordinator, Technician

• Wastewater - Manager, Stores Supervisor, Program Analyst

• Conservation Warden

• Stewardship Coordinator

Looks awfully good. Glad to see such a broad approach. Apply for Fall 2019 now!

Enjoy!

"The purpose of education is not to make men carpenters, but to make carpenters men." -- W.E.B. Du Bois

Oregon State University GEM Seminar (GEOG 407/507/607) - Winter 2019

Geography, Environmental Science & Marine Resource Management (GEM)

https://tinyurl.com/GEMSEM2019

    SEMINAR – WINTER 2019                       

Friday 3 – 4  PM   Burt Hall 193

18 January through 15 March

Public is welcome! Light refreshments will be served at 2:30.

NOTE: Much of Burt Hall is closed because of the recent fire in Burt 2. Burt 4, the part of Burt Hall containing Burt 193 is open but you must enter it directly from the outside - the East Entrance, behind Gilfillan Hall. See PDF here or Download CEOAS_complex. Burt 193 is the large green area in Burt 4. Look for the tiny arrows on the diagram. 

For an interactive map of the Burt Hall location and the OSU campus (including parking areas), click here 

PPTs/PDFs, if available, will be posted.

Student information - requirements: Download GEM_Seminar_Req_Winter_2019_v1

Questions? Contact Michael E. Campana 541-602-4085; aquadoc@oregonstate.edu

Seminar Schedule
January 18       John H. Matthews
                          Alliance for Global Water Adaptation

Climate Change and Water Management: Catalyzing Change for the Good

Download 2019_i_18_OSU_Matthews_climate

Abstract
Climate impacts are triggering increasing levels of alarm among decision makers and citizens globally but particularly in the US, which lags behind many of our peer nations in climate adaptation. In contrast, the water community has been developing innovative responses to uncertainty, increasingly extreme events, and governance challenges in a non-stationary context. Matthews will describe a variety of approaches that integrate progressive approaches within water science and governance with finance, global policy, and infrastructure design and operations.

January 25    Fatima A. M. Taha
                       Oregon State University

Serious Gaming in Water Resources Management

Download GEM_Seminar_Taha   (c. 30 MB)

Abstract
Games that incorporate realistic simulations for purposes other than pure entertainment are increasingly utilized as conflict resolution tools. It is believed they provide a shared platform for training and learning in negotiations to help broaden the scope of understanding. As such, water users and managers are encouraged to discuss their conflicting positions to come up with a mutual agreement by role-playing as different stakeholders for a shared resource.

February  1       Steven Sobieszczyk,
                           U.S. Geological Survey

The Art of Good Science Communication

Download SobiePresentation

Abstract
Learning about effective communication is easy. Actually following through and communicating effectively...well, not so much. Scientists are brilliant and attentive people but they seem to stumble on the simple nuances of how most people talk day-to-day. Talking science to others doesn't need to be discouraging or devolve to "dumbing down your research." It's about being wise. Being selective. It's about putting yourself in their shoes. Be clear, concise, and a bit irreverent. Now sit back and enjoy, here's some simple advice for talking science clearly. 

February 8       David G. Lewis
                          Ethnohistory Research, LLC

Territories and Lifeways of the Lower Chinookan Tribes

I will address the cultural and lifeways of the Chinookans, show they territories and present new information about the claimed territories of the Lower Chinook in 1851.  I will address anthropological perspectives about tribal territories and offer a challenge to some long-held assumptions about the Chinookan peoples. Much of this information can be found on my blog site ndnhistoryresearch.

Dinhubna, Qa'pai!

{din-hub-na, ka-pi}

(I feel good in my heart/ thank you, Goodbye)

 (Kalapuyan Greeting)

Camas (Ti'p) is noted to be the iconic symbol of the Kalapuyans, but they also had words for Caterpillar (Antca′yε t) and Cooked caterpillar (Guc-antca′yε t), suggesting that this was a common food as well. 

February 15    Kerry Griffin
                        Pacific Fishery Management Council                   

Fisheries Management: What I Thought it was Going to be Like when I was in Graduate School, and What it’s Really Like in a Time of Climate Change and Global Markets   

February 22   Lindsey Aldaco-Manner, President
                        World Youth Parliament for Water

Water, Youth and the Global Water Agenda

Youth, women, refugees, and indigenous communities are among the most vulnerable populations when it comes to access to clean water, sanitation and health (WASH). As the UN-Water theme this year has been set to “Leave No One Behind” the World Youth Parliament for Water (WYPW) will continue to work vigorously to ensure that the voices of youth are heard and not left behind in influencing water policy. To support youth access to clean water, WYPW supports “youth-led innovations, especially nature-based ones that solve local WASH challenges.” Lindsey will discuss the activities of WYPW to influence the global water agenda, youth-led water initiatives, her encounter with Palestinian refugees and their water situation, as well as draw upon her recent research on water governance in Lebanon.

March 1          Jackie Dingfelder, PhD
                        Hatfield School of Government
                        Portland State University

Wicked Water Problems: Can Network Governance Deliver? Integrated Water Management Case Studies from New Zealand and Oregon, USA

PPT: Download JackieD_OSU_Water

PDF: Download JackieD_OSU_Water  

Abstract
Integrated water management is a wicked public policy problem with no clear path to resolution. This presentation is based on an in-depth qualitative comparative analysis of two collaborative governance processes created to tackle complex water problems in New Zealand and Oregon, U.S.A. Both cases convened a wide range of state and non-state actors in efforts to find common ground, build consensus for change, and develop innovative water policy solutions.

 

March 8           Lisa Beutler
                         Executive Facilitator, Stantec
                         Consulting
                         President, American Water Reso. Association 

What in the Heck is Going on Here?

PPT: Download Beutler_What_Heck_8March2019

PDF: Download Beutler_What_Heck_8March2019

Abstract
Climate change, changes in demographics and land use, and social stratification continue to drive a need for new natural resource management approaches.  Yet the challenges of asking a community to make changes in how things are done, or forging an agreement among multiple parties are often large.  While academics and managers may have a strong understanding of what “should” occur, stakeholders may have entirely different ideas or even be working from a completely different set of facts. During this session we will consider how to reassess a situation to better understand the community and decision making environment to determine what the heck is actually going on.  We will then discuss how the results of the assessment can be used to formulate change, project approaches, and community relations.  This will include considering how a failure to address these factors increases project management risks.  Case studies across several natural resource disciplines will be provided to illustrate concepts.

March 15        L. Nicole (Nicky) Arellano 
                        Oregon State University

What I Learned Supporting Community-Based WASH Projects in Rural Panama

From 2016 to 2018, Lisabeth 'Nicky' Arellano served with the Peace Corps as a health volunteer in rural Panama. Her work involved training committees in the construction and maintenance of water and sanitation systems and in the design and implementation of behavior change strategies targeting hygiene practices. She will share her experiences and discuss challenges, failures, and successes, and what they taught her.

PDF: Download Nicky_PCMI  (156 MB)

The American Chemical Society's Resource Site for Sustainable Water

In my never-ending search for Internet resources I stumbled upon the American Chemical Society's Sustainable Water site.

The American Chemical Society? Why not? The ACS, one of the world's premier and largest professional societies, can use its prodigious resources (like the journal ES&T) to elucidate some of the important issues surrounding water resources sustainability - especially those issues involving water quality - treatment, contamination, fate and transport, etc.).

Climate science and the enrgy-water nexus are also addressed - think of the relation of chemicals to climate change. And ACS also has a Global Water Initiative: The Grand Challenge of Water.Who knew?

The site begins:

Resources for understanding the challenges in providing a sustainable supply of clean water and the solutions

and

Billions of people around the world are facing shortages of clean water. At least 80 countries already have water shortages that threaten human health and economic activity. Almost one billion people lack reliable access to clean drinking water. And the situation may worsen with population growth and global climate change.

Then comes this short video (link here):

The video presents not much new for the inveterate WaterWonk but it is informative to the uninitiated.

There is a lot on the site - most are links to ACS material, organized under these headings:

1) Responding to the Challenge

2) Water-Borne Diseases

3) Water Treatment and Purification

4) Water Shortages

5) Water Desalination

6) Water Pollution

7) Oil Spills and Clean-Ups

8) Other

Underneath the headings are the categories (not each is under every category): Press Releases and Other Print; Congressional Briefings and Other Presentations; Chemical and Engineering News: Videos; Podcasts; Blog Posts.

This is a great resource; the ACS is to be congratulated. Give it a view.

Check out ACS's Sustainability and Sustainable Energy sites.

Enjoy!

“You must love chemistry even when it is not working. You must love chemistry unconditionally.” - Weike Wang

Cynthia, Christmas & Civics: Environmental Civics at the University of Florida

It's always a good time to think about water ethics but it seems especially apropos this time of year when thoughts turn to goodwill towards all our sisters and brothers. Time for good cheer, too.

And environmental civics?

Check out this email from friend and journalist extraordinaire Cynthia Barnett (who is working on her seashell book):

I realized I should write you about one thing I'm doing at UF that I'm very excited about, which is joining a team of water scientists to inspire and train their incoming PhD cohort in the art of what we're calling Environmental Civics -- ie the kinds of things you're good at: telling the story of water, how to reach out to lawmakers and policy-makers, giving TED talks, writing op-eds and the like. There has been a lot of talk at UF about making this part of science PhD training, but this cohort will be the first time it's truly written into the mission. I thought you'd be particularly interested in this and if you want to know more about the cohort, which is devoted to high-latitude hydrology, the announcement is here.

 

Of course if you have any students you think would like to work with someone like me as they study water science, send them my way and I can introduce them to any of the scientists they're interested in. deadline is 16 January.

 

From the website:

Environmental civics: Communications skills and civic engagement and outreach will be a key element of each student’s program and figure prominently in the experience. Each student will:

1. Take two courses among several in these areas offered at UF, one in science/environmental communication for general audiences and another in leadership training, to develop core competencies in translating science to the general public, stakeholders and decision-makers;
2. Complete a civic engagement activity such as service to Greenlandic communities, provide testimony at public hearings, take a policy maker to the field, or another activity of the students’ design that will help build students' capacity for public engagement and thought leadership;
3. Complete an environmental civics product as part of their portfolio that could include traditional or innovative approaches such as a science-policy white paper; an article for general readers; a TED talk; or a short documentary film on the student’s area of research.

Get in touch with Cynthia: cynthiabarnett@gmail.com.

We need to expand this beyond just the PhD level. 

Enjoy!

“I’m just trying to do my part to save the world.” - J. Cornell MIchel

CRS Insight Report: 'Revisiting the Doubling Effort - Trends in Federal Funding for Basic Research in the Physical Sciences and Engineering'

Here is a brief CRS report by John F. Sargent, Jr., released on 27 November 2018: Revisiting the Doubling Effort: Trends in Federal Funding for Basic Research in the Physical Sciences and Engineering. 

Download CRS_Insight_Doubling_Effect.27Nov2018

Here are the first few paragraphs.

Introduction

The adequacy of federal investment in physical sciences and engineering (PS&E) basic research is a long-standing concern of many in industry and academia. This topic received much attention in the early 2000s due to perceived underinvestment in these disciplines. Many Members of Congress, industry leaders, and science and technology policy analysts asserted that the long-term competitive position and national security of the United States depended in large measure on the rapid increases in federal funding for PS&E. PS&E research provides the foundation for materials, products, and manufacturing technologies spanning a wide range of industries, including automotive, chemicals, semiconductors, electronics, telecommunications, aerospace, defense, and pharmaceuticals.

Stakeholder interest in increasing federal PSE funding was further fueled by the doubling of funding for life sciences research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from FY1998 to FY2003. Although the NIH doubling had broad support, some subsequently expressed concerns that it had created an imbalance in the federal research portfolio that undervalued PS&E research and might reduce the number of students choosing to pursue PS&E graduate degrees.

Momentum toward a doubling effort for PS&E research was catalyzed by a 2005 National Academies report, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future (RAGS). The report, requested by several Members of Congress, recommended doubling federal basic research funding over seven years, emphasizing fields such as the physical sciences and engineering.

In 2006, President George W. Bush launched the American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI), which sought to increase federal funding for PS&E research by doubling funding over 10 years for targeted accounts at the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Energy (DOE), and Department of Commerce (DOC). The targeted accounts included all NSF accounts, the DOE Office of Science, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology's Scientific and Technical Research and Services (STRS) and Construction of Research Facilities (CRF) accounts with DOC. Since Congress provides appropriations for agencies and programs, not for particular fields of science and engineering, these PS&E-focused accounts served as surrogates for the effort.

In 2007, Congress passed the America COMPETES Act (COMPETES 2007, P.L. 110-69), which authorized funding for the accounts identified in the ACI for FY2008-FY2010. In aggregate, the FY2010 authorized amounts represented a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.3% over the FY2006 level (a growth rate that would result in doubling in seven years if this growth rate were sustained). Actual appropriations were lower than the authorized levels, with actual FY2010 appropriations corresponding to a 6.4% CAGR over FY2006 (a doubling pace of 11 years).

Concerns that gave rise to the America COMPETES Act had not subsided when the act's authorizations of appropriations expired. Congress sought to address these ongoing concerns with enactment of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 (COMPETES 2010, P.L. 111-358). Congressional support for COMPETES 2010 lacked the wider bicameral consensus enjoyed by COMPETES 2007. While COMPETES 2010 passed the Senate by unanimous consent, the House vote on the final bill was 228-130, in large measure because of the bill's proposed increases in authorized spending for FY2010-FY2013. Like COMPETES 2007, a pillar of COMPETES 2010 was increased funding for the targeted accounts. Authorizations for FY2013 represented a 6.5% CAGR over FY2006, a doubling pace of approximately 11 years. Actual FY2013 appropriations, however, were lower than the authorized level and even below the FY2010 appropriations level. Actual FY2013 appropriations represented a 3.1% CAGR from FY2006, a doubling pace of 22 years—more than triple the length of time originally envisioned in COMPETES 2007 and twice as long as the COMPETES 2010 doubling pace.

Click here to read the entire document with figures and hot links.

Enjoy!

"Hell is full of good meanings, but heaven is full of good works".- Unknown